Savings Bank v. St. Paul Plow Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Bunn, J., denying a motion to set aside the conclusions of law made by the court and for judgment in favor of plaintiff notwithstanding such conclusions.
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM.
This cause was tried without a jury, and the trial court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the defendants. Thereupon the plaintiff made a motion to set aside the conclusions of law and for judgment, notwithstanding such conclusions, in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff appealed from an order denying the motion, and the defendants moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is nonappealable. The motion must be granted.
An order denying a motion that the court change its conclusion of law in its decision upon its trial of a cause without a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- St. Anthony Falls Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Shepard v. PettitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gay v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Hodge v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hostager v. Northwest Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Peterson v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.