Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., denying its motion to set aside a verdict for f500 in favor of plaintiff, and that judgment be entered for defendant notwithstanding the verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff had a verdict. Upon a settled case defendant corporation moved to set aside the verdict, and that judgment be entered in its favor notwithstanding the same.
This appeal is from an order denying the motion. No motion was made in the court below for a new trial. The order is not appealable. It was so suggested in Eckman v. Lauer, 67 Minn. 221, 69 N. W. 893, and it was so held in St. Anthony v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318, 69 N. W. 1077. The only difference in the facts between the case last cited and the present is that there the motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Anthony Falls Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Eckman v. LauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by31 opinions
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.