Peterson v. Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Waite, J., denying a motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM.
This action was brought to recover the value of certain household goods belonging to the plaintiff, which, it was alleged, the defendant had converted to his own use. After a trial by the court without a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to this court from an order denying his motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
An examination of the record fails to disclose any reversible error. But an order denying a motion to amend findings is not appealable. Rogers v. Hedemark, 70 Minn. 441, 73 N. W.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. HedemarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Wheadon v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Savings Bank v. St. Paul Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Koeper v. Town of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910