Hostager v. Northwest Paper Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by tbe administrator of the estate of Harold Anderson, deceased, in the district court for Carlton county to recover $1,999.99 damages for the death of his intestate. The ease was tried before Cant, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,500. From an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the- verdict, it appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
P.ER CURIAM.
Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant-moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and appealed from an order denying it.
We are confronted at the outset with the fact that the order is not appealable. We have repeatedly held that an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict- is not appealable. Oelschlegel v. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co., 71 Minn. 50, 73 N. W. 631; Savings Bank of St. Paul v. St. Paul Plow Co., 76 Minn. 7, 78 N. W. 873; Kalz v. Winona & St. Peter Ry. Co., 76 Minn. 351, 79…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Kalz v. Winona & St. Peter Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Savings Bank v. St. Paul Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caswell v. Minar Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Turner v. CrumptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Carlstrom v. North Star Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916