St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from that part of an order of the district court for Stearns county, Baxter, J., which denied its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This is an action on a promissory note made by defendants. The answer alleges that the defendants signed the note when they were intoxicated. The trial court ordered a verdict against the defendant Arthur Graham for the amount of the note, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Thomas Graham. The plaintiff then made an alternative motion for judgment in its favor against Thomas Graham notwithstanding the.verdict, or for a new trial as to such‘defendant. The trial court denied so much of the motion as asked for judgment absolute, and granted a new trial. The plaintiff appealed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamberton v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Kernan v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hemstad v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Croft v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Maxfield v. BierbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Gay v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.