Legal Opinion
Gillum v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 17, 1997No. Civil Action 94-4197-DESPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26). Plaintiff has filed a Memorandum in Opposition to defendants’ Motion (Doc. 29). Defendants have filed a Reply (Doc. 46). This ease arises out of plaintiffs claim of hostile work environment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, constructive discharge, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted.
I. FACTS
The following facts are either…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Yurman Designs, Inc. v. PAJ, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Marten v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- O'Shea v. Yellow Technology Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Diaz v. RamsdenSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.