Legal Opinion

Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1998No. 97-3203, 97-3204PublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Michele Penry and Debra Ann Gillum sued their employer, Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka (FHLB), for sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and for intentional infliction of emotional distress under Kansas state law. Gillum, who resigned pri- or to suing the bank, also claimed constructive discharge. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on all claims. Penry and Gillum appeal the grants of summary judgment, and we exercise jurisdiction over their consolidated appeals under 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. Alfano v. CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Alamo Heights Independent School District v. Catherine ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Alfano v. CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API