Legal Opinion

People v. Mayes

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1896No. Crim. No. 154PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant was convicted of felony in stealing a blue steer, and has appealed from the judgment thereon and from an order denying a new trial. The evidence connecting him with the taking of the animal was sharply conflicting, and testimony impeaching nearly all of the witnesses who testified on either side of the case was presented to the jury. Under these circumstances the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is not open for examination.

Appellant contends that the conduct of the district attorney was such as to prejudice his case before the jury, and to prevent him from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Lovvorn v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API