People v. Levine
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinions of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
In the petition for and in the argument upon rehearing, it is suggested that in Department we fell into error in relation to the evidence in regard to the pieces of candle left at the saloon by the plumber. We stated that he left three half candles there, and that three pieces of caudle were found at the time of the fire. Our attention is now called to the fact that, according to the testimony of the plumber himself, he left one whole candle, a half candle, and a piece of another half candle; and that, according to the other evidence, only *40two pieces of candle were found at the time of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. Lee GamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. Wong Ah FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.