People v. McLean
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the crime of embezzlement and from an order denying a new trial. Certain errors of law are urged, which we will notice in their order.
1. It is claimed that the proof shows a fatal variance from the charge in the information. The information charges that the defendant, as agent and bailee of one Cohn, was intrusted with certain jewelry, therein described, to be sold by defendant, and the proceeds thereof, or the property, returned to Cohn. That defendant did feloniously embezzle the said jewelry and convert the same to his own use,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by50 opinions
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Los Angeles Bar Ass'n v. California Protective Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.