Legal Opinion

Griffeth v. Fehsel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1943No. Civ. 14139PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the finding that a joint venture whereby the parties hereto had operated was terminated by mutual agreement of the parties. Judgment having been awarded defendants upon such finding, plaintiff appeals.

Prior to his association with Oscar J. Fehsel, hereinafter referred to as defendant or respondent, plaintiff was a retail distributor of a certain health food, hereinafter referred to as Concentra, which was manufactured by Jean Ferrell, Inc. of Chicago. Defendant had recently retired from the wholesale grain and flour…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Booth v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Ruppe v. UtterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Logoluso v. LogolusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Pilch v. MilikinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Hilgendorf v. DensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Andersen v. HowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API