Karrick v. Hannaman
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. This was a suit brought April 17, 1890, in the third judicial district court of the Territory of TJtah, by Hannaman against Karriok for the dissolution of a partnership, formed February ■3, 1886, by an agreement in writing, by which they agreed.to become partners in a mercantile and laundry business for the term of five years from that date, with a capital stock of $25,000, of which the plaintiff was to furnish $5000,…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. This was a suit brought April 17, 1890, in the third judicial district court of the Territory of TJtah, by Hannaman against Karriok for the dissolution of a partnership, formed February ■3, 1886, by an agreement in writing, by which they agreed.to become partners in a mercantile and laundry business for the term of five years from that date, with a capital stock of $25,000, of which the plaintiff was to furnish $5000, and the defendant $20,000; the. defendant lent the plaintiff the sum of $5000 for five years, for which the plaintiff…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gbay
Much of' the argument for the appellant was devoted to a discussion of conflicting evidence, which is not open to examination by this court, its authority upon appeal from the Supreme Court of a Territory being limited to the question whether the facts found by that court support its judgment. Haws v. Victoria Co., 160 U. S. 303; Harrison v. Perea, cunte, 311.
The principal question of law discussed in the opinion of the Supreme Court of the Territory, and at the argument in this court, was whether a partnership, which by the copart-nership articles is to continue for a specified time, can be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bank v. Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rodgers v. RAB Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. BVD AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.