Legal Opinion

Lind v. Webber

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1913No. 1871PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from the Seventh Judicial District Court, Esmeralda County; Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by H. B. Lind and George L. Kaeding against W. H. Webber, John T. Hodson, James R. Davis, and Nevada Hills Mining Company (a corporation). Judgment for defendants; from the judgment and from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ motion to retax costs, plaintiffs appeal. Petition for a rehearing pending. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, C. J.:

This case is based on an agreement for locating and acquiring mining claims. In the extended and carefully prepared briefs a number of questions relating to conflicting evidence and interesting propositions of law have been presented, which under our view we need not determine. From the findings of the court, which are as favorable to respondent as the conflicting testimony will warrant, and from the undisputed evidence *625sufficient facts appear to enable us to reach a conclusion as to the ultimate rights of the parties.

At Goldfield, on the 3d day of February, 1906,…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re ReillyBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API