Andersen v. Howland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Arlene Andersen appeals from a judgment entered after a jury returned a $2,800 verdict in this action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff’s car was struck from the rear by a car driven by defendant Ruth Howland, The sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial, limited to the issue of damages, on the basis of newly discovered evidence.
The physician who treated appellant, William S. T. Jackson, M.D., testified that appellant had received a typical “whiplash” injury of the neck, evidenced by pain, limitation of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Lippold v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Scanlan v. San Francisco & San Joaquin RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clemens v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Scott v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cansdale v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Barrese v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Melcher v. MelcherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.