Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The first issue before this Court is whether the Full Commission erred in finding that the provisions of G.S. 97-33 “show unequivocally that the defendants are obligated to pay only for the disability caused by this accident.”
The Industrial Commission is the sole arbiter of issues of fact. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co., 305 N.C. 593, 290 S.E. 2d 682 (1982). Our review is limited to a determination of whether the Commission’s findings are supported by any competent evidence and whether its conclusions of law are supported by those findings. Id.
G.S. 97-33 provides:
If an employee is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Brown v. Family Dollar Distribution CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Hoyle v. Carolina Associated MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Lettley v. Trash Removal ServiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Cox v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Davis v. Columbus County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.