Brown v. Family Dollar Distribution Center
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Defendants assign error to the Industrial Commission’s findings of fact Nos. 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10; to its conclusions of law Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4; and to the Commission’s award. “The standard of appellate review of an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is well established. Our review ‘is limited to a determination of (1) whether the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by any competent evidence in the record; and (2) whether the Commission’s findings justify its legal conclusions.’ ” Aaron v. New Fortis Homes, Inc., 127 N.C. App. 711, 714, 493 S.E.2d 305, 306…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Wilder v. Barbour Boat WorksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Weaver v. American National Can Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Baldus v. Mac Sign Comp. Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- Baldwin v. a Southern SeasonNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- Baldwin v. a Southern Season, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- Barnes v. Moses Cone Health Sys.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
- Brown v. N.C. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.