Legal Opinion

City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

The City of Lancaster (City) petitions for review of the orders respectively entered by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) on September 22, 1999, October 22, 1999, and November 4, 1999, regarding the City’s proposed jurisdictional rate increase of $999,937, representing an 18.8% increase over existing rates for water service provided to customers located outside the City’s municipal boundaries, as presented in the City’s Supplement No. 28 to Tariff Water-Pa. PUC No. 6. Consolidated with the foregoing matter are cross-petitions for review filed by the municipalities of Manheim,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. At & T Communications v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Friends of the Atglensusquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Emporium Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Respond Power, LLC v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API