Legal Opinion
Friends of the Atglensusquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 18, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Friends of the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail, Inc. (FAST) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) that with minor modifications adopted the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and approved two Stipulations of Settlement (Settlements) that the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) entered into with seven townships in Lancaster County and with the Pennsylvania De*584partment of Transportation (DOT). The Settlements relate to the abolition of rail-highway crossings along the former Enola Branch rail line and to the transfer of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Barnes FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- City of Chester v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Condemnation by the County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.