Legal Opinion
At & T Communications v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1990No. 303 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
AT & T Communications of Pennsylvania (AT & T) appeals an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) holding that AT & T violated Section 1501 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. § 1501 when it failed to provide Michael Dayton with adequate service by misrepresenting and/or misquoting the telephone rates of AT & T and Bell of Pennsylvania.
This appeal stems from Dayton filing a complaint with the PUC against AT & T for AT & T’s failure to bill him at the telephone rate quoted to him by a representative of 'AT & T. The quoted rate was for “actual conversation time”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Elkin v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Dee-Dee Cab, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.