Legal Opinion

City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

In this public utility case, the parties essentially litigate the question of how much litigation is excessive. The case arises from the City of Lancaster’s (City) efforts to increase the rates that it charges to provide wastewater service. An administrative law judge (ALJ) for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) entered a recommended decision that significantly reduced the rate increase sought by the City, mostly on the grounds that the expenses claimed by the City were excessive. The Commission denied the City’s exceptions and adopted the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Butler Township Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Industrial and Commercial Gas Users Group v. PA Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Red Lion Municipal Auth. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. T.J. McCloskey, Acting Consumer Advocate v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API