Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 2015No. 1012 C.D. 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BERNARD L. McGINLEY.

BACKGROUND

Tanya J. McCloskey, Acting Consumer Advocate from the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitions for review of the Opinion and Order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) entered May 22, 2014, in the matter of Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s (Columbia) Petition for Approval of a Distribution' System Improvement Charge (DSIC) to recover the costs associated with certain distribution system improvement projects. 1

At the outset, this Court notes that in Pennsylvania, the age and condition of the infrastructure of utilities…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCloskey, T. v. PUC, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. McCloskey, T. v. PUC, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. McCloskey, T. v. PUC; Metro Edison Co, ApltsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Philadelphia Industrial and Commercial Gas Users Group v. PA Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Respond Power, LLC v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API