Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 7, 1994No. 12347PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant, the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff, Evelyn Bennett, and remanding the case to the employment security board of review for a hearing to determine the amount of benefits to be awarded. On appeal, the administrator claims that the trial court improperly construed General Statutes § 31-236 (a) (2) (A) (ii)1 to eliminate the requirement that Bennett must be available for work in order to be eligible for benefits under General Statutes § 31-235 (a) (2).2 We reverse the judgment of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Latina v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Curtin v. Administrator, No. Cv 95 0145553 (Nov. 13, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Dickey v. Admin., Unemployment Comp., No. Cv 94 0142164 (Sep. 12, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Doyle v. Administrator, Unemploy. Comp., No. Cv 94 0136643 (Sep. 29, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Foster v. Administrator, No. Cv 96 0150264 (Nov. 19, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.