Legal Opinion
Burnham v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 1981PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This case is an aftermath of Storm Larry, a blizzard that led the governor of the state on February 7 and 8, 1978, to impose a state-wide driving ban. Because of that driving ban, the defendant employer, United Technologies, closed its Pratt & Whitney Aircraft plant, and the plaintiff-claimant, Robert Burnham, was unable to report to work. The plaintiff has been awarded partial unemployment benefits by the defendant administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-229. Although that award was affirmed by the appeals referee and by the board of review, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.