Legal Opinion
Latina v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 1999No. AC 18098PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant administrator1 of the Unemployment Compensation Act, General Statutes § 31-222 et seq., appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the plaintiffs2 appeal from the determination by the employment security board of review (board) that because the plaintiff had engaged in wilful misconduct, he was not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The sole issue on appeal is whether the plaintiffs actions constitute wilful misconduct within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 31-236, as amended by Public Acts 1995, No. 95-323, § 3.3 We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bennett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Dacey v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Waste Associates, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 2008
- Farrow v. Administrator, Uca, No. Cv 01-0186563 (Jul. 11, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Gluck v. Adm. Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv99 0060485s (Sep. 27, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999