Souza v. Lauppe
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
In this suit between farmers of neighboring parcels, brought after plaintiffs switched from rice to row crops, plaintiffs allege that defendants’ rice farming has caused water to seep under and onto plaintiffs’ property, resulting in damage to the property and lost profits from plaintiff’s farming operations.
Defendants successfully moved for summary judgment on the ground plaintiffs’ action is precluded by Civil Code section 3482.5, which provides that a commercial agricultural activity conducted for more than three years consistent with accepted standards in the locality…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Metropolitan Water District v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.