Legal Opinion
Young v. Gannon
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 2002No. B146236PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
John D. Young appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate. We affirm the judgment.
Statement of Facts
Appellant’s Termination as a Workers’ Compensation Judge
Appellant was appointed to be a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) for the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). In June 1994, he attended new judges’ training, which included presentations on the timeliness of decisions. Thereafter, in at least two quarterly trainings, he received instruction on the 90-day rule. Under this rule, a WCJ may not receive his or her salary while any…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hoitt v. Department of RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Albillo v. Intermodal Container Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.