Legal Opinion
Century City Med. Plaza v. Sperling, Isaacs & Eisenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 2001No. B133901PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The Supreme Court recently had occasion to consider, in two companion cases, the circumstances under which a court could or could not “correct” an arbitration award. (Moshonov v. Walsh (2000) 22 Cal.4th 771 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 597, 996 P.2d 699] (Moshonov); Moore v. First Bank of San Luis Obisbo (2000) 22 Cal.4th 782 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 603, 996 P.2d 706] (Moore).) An issue not presented in those cases is the one raised in this appeal. We are asked to determine whether an arbitrator may properly modify or amend an award, after it has been issued but before it has been confirmed by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Charles J. Rounds Co. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42California Supreme Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boghos v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Law Offices of David S. Karton v. SegretoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.