Boghos v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
This case presents issues concerning the effect and enforceability of an arbitration clause in a contract of disability insurance. The lower courts refused to compel arbitration of contract and tort claims brought by the insured against the insurer after the latter ceased paying benefits. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. Background
Antone Boghos owned a plumbing business. In September 1998, he applied to a Los Angeles insurance broker for disability insurance underwritten by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London (hereafter the Underwriters). Boghos…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.