Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We granted review to address an important question of law: Does a trial court have authority to “consolidate” a contractual arbitration proceeding between an insurer and an insured as to uninsured motorist coverage in the insured’s pending action against third parties—strictly speaking, does it have authority to join the insurer as a defendant as to uninsured motorist coverage issues—for all purposes, including trial, in order to avoid conflicting rulings on a common issue of law or fact? As we shall explain, we conclude that the answer that we must give is: Yes.
I
Although it…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.