Legal Opinion
Law Offices of David S. Karton v. Segreto
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 2009No. B211129PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
We are here concerned with a Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act (MFAA) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6200 et seq.) nonbinding arbitration and the proceedings which followed when the attorney, who was successful at the arbitration, was not satisfied with the amount awarded by the arbitrators. Although the client had been willing to pay the attorney the amount of the award, the attorney petitioned the trial court to “correct” the award to include additional sums. The trial court denied the petition to correct, on the basis that the attorney sought modifications to the award beyond those…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Mid-Wilshire Associates v. O'LEARYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Louise Gardens of Encino Homeowners' Ass'n v. Truck Insurance Exchange Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Century City Med. Plaza v. Sperling, Isaacs & EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Delaney v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hopkins & Carley v. GensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cinel v. ChristopherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.