Legal Opinion
Schirmer v. Souza
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 22, 2011No. AC 31788PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendants, Antone Souza, Sr., and Dorothy Souza, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, Robert Schirmer and Sandra Schirmer, on their claim of unjust enrichment arising out of renovations to a house on property owned by the defendants. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) applied the doctrine of unjust enrichment to parties who had no contractual relationship, (2) found that the plaintiffs’ funds were spent to renovate the defendants’ real property, (3) found that the defendants realized a profit from the sale of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carney v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- DEROY v. Estate of BaronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Horner v. BagnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- BHP Land Services, LLC v. SeymourConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.