Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Cephalon, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-4191PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM.
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This is a fraud and unjust enrichment case brought by The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and the Standard Fire Insurance Company (collectively, the plaintiffs, or “Travelers”) against Cephalon, *541Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. The plaintiffs are workers’ compensation insurers who claim that they were injured because they paid for or reimbursed prescriptions for Actiq and Fentora, two pain-management medications owned by the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aetna Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Medical Mutual v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re Actiq Sales & Marketing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Markland v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.