Legal Opinion

United States v. Hatters' Fur Exchange

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 18, 1911No. 4PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court of Appeals, for Second Circuit, Abstract 16813 (T. D. 28429).

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Judge

In 1905, the Hatters’ Pur Exchange imported into New York certain merchandise which was returned by the local appraiser as *199“fur not on the skin prepared for hatters’ use.” The collector assessed duty at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem, under paragraph 426 of the tariff act of 1897, which provides that:

426. Furs, dressed on the skin but not made up into articles, and furs not on the skin, prepared for hatters’ use, including fur skins carroted, twenty per centum ad valorem.

The importer objected to the classification and assessment, claiming that the merchandise was dutiable under paragraph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eidman v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Salomon Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. GavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API