Salomon Bros. & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7242 (T. D. 31739).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
court:*
The tariff act of 1897, in paragraph 463, imposed a duty upon waste not specially provided for of 10 per cent ad valorem. Paragraph 479 of the act of 1909. is identical.
Paragraph 566 of the act of 1897 reads as follows: .
Grasses and fibers: Istle or Tampico fiber, jute, jute butts, manila, sisal grass, sunn, and all other textile grasses or fibrous vegetable substances, not dressed or manufactured in any manner, and not specially provided for in this act.
This paragraph appears in the free list. The corresponding paragraph in the act of 1909 is identical with this with the exception…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Thermal Syndicate, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.