Legal Opinion

Willits & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1923No. 2213PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe appraiser described tbe importations as follows:

The merchandise covered by this protest consists of beef cracklings. It is the refuse or waste that remains after the tallow has been cooked out of the meat. It is used here as a part of manufactured chicken feed.

This brief description of tbe merchandise is substantially correct. It appears from tbe uncontradicted testimony in tbe case that in tbe operation of meat-packing bouses in South America, as in this country also, there remains a considerable amount of refuse meat, consisting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Malouf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Salomon Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Koons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API