Legal Opinion

People v. Birks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1998No. S057191PublishedCited by 288 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*112Opinion

BAXTER, J.

California law has long provided that even absent a request, and over any party’s objection, a trial court must instruct a criminal jury on any lesser offense “necessarily included” in the charged offense, if there is substantial evidence that only the lesser crime was committed. This venerable instructional rule ensures that the jury may consider all supportable crimes necessarily included within the charge itself, thus encouraging the most accurate verdict permitted by the pleadings and the evidence. The rule also accords both parties equal procedural treatment, and thus…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by288 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

283 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API