Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. William Humble
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2014No. 14-15624PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc., Dr. William Richardson, and Tucson Women’s Center appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin enforcement of an Arizona statute, Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 36-449.03(E)(6), and its implementing regulation, Ariz. Admin. Code § R9-10-1508(G), which restrict the manner in which certain medications may be used to perform abortions. The district court denied the preliminary injunction because it found that plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Mark Baird v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Planned Parenthood of Wiscons v. Brad D. SchimelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. James CaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. StrangeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.