Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Wiscons v. Brad D. Schimel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 23, 2015No. 15-1736PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

On July 5, 2013, the Governor of Wisconsin signed into law a statute that the Wisconsin legislature had passed the previous month. So far as relates to this appeal the statute prohibits a doctor, under threat of heavy penalties if he defies the prohibition, from performing an abortion (and in Wisconsin only doctors are allowed to perform abortions, Wis. Stat. § 940.15(5)) unless he has admitting privi- ■ leges at a hospital no more than 80 miles from the clinic in which the abortion is performed. Wis. Stat. § 253.095(2).

A doctor granted admitting privileges by a hospital…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Victor K. Williams v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. James CaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Eric FriedlanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API