Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. Owen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge Montgomery
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
In these cases, we reaffirm the' obligation of the federal courts to exercise their jurisdiction in the absence of a valid justification for not doing so. Specifically, we find that the cases had proceeded beyond the “embryonic stage” in the District Court before the corresponding state cases were filed, and therefore abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), was inappropriate.
Turning to the merits of the preliminary injunction motions in the cases, we conclude that Nationwide' is unlikely…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sammy Page v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Melissa Cook v. Cynthia HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jonathan Duke v. Josie GasteloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Tokyo Gwinnett, LLC v. Gwinnett County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.