Legal Opinion

Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 2011No. G044216PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.

We reluctantly return in this case to the question of default judgments with a cautionary tale—well, three actually. The first is a tale for plaintiff’s attorneys, who may assume a defendant’s default is an unalloyed gift: an opportunity to obtain a big judgment with no significant effort. It is not. Instead, when a defendant fails to timely respond to the complaint, the first thing plaintiff’s counsel should do (after offering an extension of time to respond)1 is review the complaint with care, to ascertain whether it supports the specific judgment the client…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Carlsen v. KoivumakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Kleveland V.Siegel & Wolensky LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API