Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Geico General Insurance

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2014No. Case No. 1:12-CV-2028 AWI JLTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District ' Judge.

This is an insurance dispute between Plaintiff Amy McDaniel (“McDaniel”) and GEICO General Insurance Co. (“GEICO”). McDaniel is the assignee of a bad faith failure to settle claim against GEICO. Both parties bring cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, GEICO’s motion will be denied and McDaniel’s motion will be granted.

FACTAUL BACKGROUND1

In 2008, Edward Murotani (“Murotani”) was diagnosed with diabetes. See PUF 1. On June 11, 2008, Murotani purchased an automobile insurance policy…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. Lindblom v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API