Legal Opinion

Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 17, 2018No. A151390PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSimons, J.

*301After plaintiff and appellant Joshua P. Pagnini (appellant) failed to respond to a demurrer filed by defendants and respondents Union Bank, N.A. and Unionbancal Mortgage Corporation (respondents), the trial court sustained the demurrer and entered judgment in favor of respondents. Appellant appeals from the court's denial of his motion for relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) ( Section 473(b) ).1 We conclude the trial court was obligated to grant relief under the mandatory provision of Section 473(b), where appellant presented a sworn declaration from his counsel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Krinsky v. Doe 6California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Peltier v. McCloud River RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API