Sporn v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc., appeals from an order denying its motions to set aside a default and the resulting default judgment in favor of plaintiff Alan R. Spom. We agree with the trial court that the motion for relief from default was untimely and affirm the order. We deny plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and grant his motion for sanctions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff sued defendant and “John Doe” on August 14, 2002 for negligence, gross negligence, theft of identity, fraudulent misrepresentation, and fraud. The gist of his complaint is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Harbour Vista v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Nam Min ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Steven M. Garber & Associates v. EskandarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- MOGHADDAM v. BoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.