Legal Opinion
Gunner v. Van Ness Garage
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1957No. Civ. 17116PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff, Satenig Gunner, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered on the defendants’ motions based upon her failure to prosecute her action with reasonable diligence. The original complaint was filed on December 20, 1950. No service was made on any of the defendants until September 17, 1953, and the last defendant served was the defendant Mohawk Petroleum Corporation on December 16, 1953.
Certain of the defendants filed a demurrer on August 4, 1954. An amended complaint was filed on September 10, 1954, to which the same defendants filed a demurrer on September 28, 1954. This demurrer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Knight v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Voorheis v. Hawthorne-Michaels Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.