Legal Opinion

Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1956No. Docket Nos. 9003, 9004PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Two actions were begun in the respondent court, in each of which the plaintiffs sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted. The actions were consolidated for trial. In each certain defendants moved for dismissal under section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the statute which requires trial within five years from the date an action is begun. Respondent court denied both motions, and the moving parties have petitioned this court for a writ of mandate directing the respondent court to dismiss the actions. Both petitions have been presented…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Beswick v. Palo Verde Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API