Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Triplett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1935No. 3816PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The three United States patents involved in this suit, namely, Lowell and Dunmore, No. 1,455,141, Dunmore, No. 1,635,-117, and Dunmore and Lowell, No. 1,606,-212, were involved in three earlier suits in the District Court of Delaware, Dubilier Condenser Corporation et al. v. Radio Corporation of America, 34 F.(2d) 450, wherein it was held that the first two patents were valid and infringed, and that the third patent was not infringed. Plaintiffs did not appeal from the adverse decision upon the third patent, but the Radio Corporation of *557America prosecuted appeals from the…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instrument CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968
  3. Bettis Rubber Co. v. KleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Holzhauer Products Corp. v. ZaigerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  5. In re "Lite Beer" Trademark LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API