Legal Opinion
Holzhauer Products Corp. v. Zaiger
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 27, 1936No. Nos. 4088, 4251PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
These two infringement suits involve the same patents and were tried together. •In each case the defenses were anticipation, noninvention, and noninfringement. The patents involved are Murphy, No. *10071,378,604; reissue patent to Steinman, No. 17,821; and llolzhauer, No. 1,721,663.
Statement of Facts.
I. Murphy, No. 1,378,604.
1. On his application filed June 17, 1920, letters patent of the United States No. 1,378,604 issued to John W. Murphy-on May 17, 1921. This patent related to an improvement in condensation preventing devices. The object of the invention was to provide…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1943
- In re FrevertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Casco Products Corp. v. ZaigerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936