Legal Opinion

Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1916No. Nos. 23 and 30PublishedCited by 624 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE. CIRGÜIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. The facts, -which involve the rights of manufacturers of and dealers in flour to the use of “Tea Rose” as a trade-' mark, for flour sold in certain territory, and the effect of non-user on, right to use a trade-mark, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

These cases , were argued together, and may be disposed of in a single opinion.

In No.'. 23, the Hanover Star, Milling; Company, an Illinois corporation engaged ip the manufacture of flour in that State, filed a, bill in equity on March 4, 1912, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabaipa, against Metcalf, a citizen of the State of Alabama and a merchant engaged in the business of selling. flour at Greenville, Butler County, in that State, to restrain alleged trade-mark infringement and unfair competition. . The bill averred that for twenty-seven years last past…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by624 opinions

  1. Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

619 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API