Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the validity of certain letters patent for improvement in rubber tires, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Writ of certiorari to review a decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sustaining a patent for an improvement in rubber tires issued to Arthur W. Grant, February 18, 1896. The patent, and those which it is contended anticipate it, have received full exposition in the opinion of that court. 157 Fed. Rep. 677, and 162 Fed. Rep. 892, affirming 147 Fed. Rep. 739. It and they were also passed upon and the patent sustained in Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Columbia Pneumatic Wagon Wheel Co., 91 Fed. Rep. 978, and in Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Finlay Rubber Tire Co., 116 Fed.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by494 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Howard A. Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Graphcoat, Inc., News Publishing Company of Framingham, Newspapers of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
489 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.