State v. Davisson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY, Judge *
Charles Alen Davisson’s appeal requires that we address the right of an individual under Minn.Stat. § 609A.02, subd. 3 (2000) to seal all records relating to criminal proceedings against - him. The statute provides that certain criminal proceedings not resulting in a conviction may be expunged “if all pending actions or proceedings were resolved in favor of the petitioner.” The trial court denied Davisson’s motion to expunge the record. Appellant now asserts that he is entitled to expungement because, although the court found him guilty of the offense for which he was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- City of St. Paul v. FroyslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RonquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. C.P.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. H.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. L.W.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. J.Y.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.